My outline had to be adjusted a couple times.
My original outline was to open with a focus on Pullman, specifically on how a past Eyman initiative eliminated one-third of Pullman’s transit funding. This in turn led to the creation of the mandatory student transit fee at WSU to maintain service. I thought it was an interesting story and would draw readers in.
I was then going to give basic information on Eyman’s newest initiative, I-1033, followed by how Pullman would be impacted by it.
The story would then progress into the general debate over I-1033 with quotes from both sides about why it was good and bad.
I then hoped to end by tying the story back to Pullman.
As soon as I started writing the lede, however, I realized that the transit story required too much explanation and context to make sense. The connection to I-1033 was really more interesting, I decided, than actually relevant. It wasn’t worth it, because so much context and explanation was already required to help readers understand I-1033.
My second outline
My new lede was the significance of Pullman opposing a state initiative, setting up the introduction of I-1033.
Then briefly explain 1033 and go into its impact on Pullman, which is actually unknown.
Because Pullman’ impact is unknown, explain what is known about I-1033’s impact. (OFM)
Then the general debate over I-1033 with quotes from both sides.
End the story by tying it back to Pullman.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment